3 ms·
E cores are ~30% faster and P about 15%. So the question would be how much the Es assist when Ps are maxed on each chip. In any other situation, more/better E c
by 1123581321 3y ago
E cores are ~30% faster and P about 15%. So the question would be how much the Es assist when Ps are maxed on each chip. In any other situation, more/better E cores should outperform and extend battery. I’m not saying that means you should want to spend the money.
- greesil 3y agoCould you not resolve these questions with benchmarking?
- polishTar 3y agoI love Apple's E cores. It just sucks that the M3 pro gains so few given the reduction in P cores. Apple's E cores take up ~1/4 the die space of their P core. If the M3 pro lost 2 performance cores but gained 4-8 efficiency cores it'd be a much more reasonable trade.
- 1123581321 3y agoI’d like to see that. Good point about die space.
- dontlaugh 3y agoI’m sure the difference is GPU.