4 ms·
Strange that they mostly compare performance to M1, not M2. Probably means it's not as much faster than M2 as they would like.
by mkl 3y ago
Strange that they mostly compare performance to M1, not M2. Probably means it's not as much faster than M2 as they would like.
- EAtmULFO 3y agoExactly. I imagine most of the benefit of the new 3nm process is related to power draw. I'll bet the memory is the same stuff as the prior generation though, given those specs haven't seemed to change at all.
- ezfe 3y agoThey compared it to both, and most people upgrading will have an M1 so it's the more apt comparison (and of course, a bigger number).
- Angostura 3y agoDon't forget that there are no M2 iMacs
- guax 3y agoIts on the release linked. 15% faster than m2 for P-cores and 30% for e-cores, which is misleading, because it has 2 more of them so they're not necessarily that much faster. For me, still on m1 is good news, one more generation I can skip without feeling too much FOMO. Graphics improvement are irrelevant since im not gaming on them and cpu difference is fine for being just <40% overall.