4 ms·
There were certain language choices in the paper that led me to think that just maybe they weren't doing what they were doing, but the longer I read, the more c
by SubiculumCode 3y ago
There were certain language choices in the paper that led me to think that just maybe they weren't doing what they were doing, but the longer I read, the more certain I became that they were doing exactly what they shouldn't, wasting my time.
- maleldil 3y agoIt's satire. They're criticising "good" results obtained by trained on contaminated datasets.
- SubiculumCode 3y agowell yes, so said the discussion. I was just irritated that i read theough it that far. but not being a machine learning pro, I'm happy that I knew enough to be highly suspicious.
- marcosdumay 3y agoIt's a 3 pages paper with absurd ideas from the title on. Imagining it was not clear enough, the author decided to name the model something 'pronounced “fictional”', and shows how it can answer questions that weren't even asked yet with perfect accuracy right on the abstract. Accept that as an exercise of familiarizing yourself with the area's language. If you are interested on it, it's not lost time.
- naniwaduni 3y agoIt's a two-and-a-half-page paper with about a page and a half of total text with an obvious joke title, absurd and obviously joking claims in the abstract, and names the model "fictional". This is all before you even click through to the PDF! If it takes you reading the whole paper up to the point where the author explains the joke to realize that the paper tagged satire is satire, I mean, I'm not sure paper-reading is for you. There are unmarked papers out there that aren't even satirical, just wrong!