4 ms·
This is silly, no Teslas charge at 400 KW, so obviously that doesn't exist. Noone within the industry has expressed concerns in making the NACS connector do 400
by _ea1k 3y ago
This is silly, no Teslas charge at 400 KW, so obviously that doesn't exist. Noone within the industry has expressed concerns in making the NACS connector do 400KW.
It already runs at higher amperages than CCS, despite the lower KW.
- clouddrover 3y ago> This is silly, no Teslas charge at 400 KW This is such narrow thinking. What matters is building capable EV infrastructure for all EVs, and that means going beyond 250 kW. Teslas are mid-range when it comes to charging. Other EVs are faster and need not be limited by what Teslas can achieve. Think bigger. Europe is: https://www.fleeteurope.com/en/new-energies/europe/article/fast-chargers-every-60-km-key-eu-motorways?a=FJA05&t%5B0%5D=Charging&curl=1 https://www.fleeteurope.com/en/new-energies/europe/article/f...
- IshKebab 3y agoI don't think you understood his point.
- clouddrover 3y agoHe wasn't making one.
- _ea1k 3y agoYes, I was. There is nothing about NACS that limits things to 250KW.
- clouddrover 3y agoNo, you weren't. Remember: the claim is that NACS is "clearly superior" to CCS Type 2 Combo. It's clearly not.