4 ms·

> I got far better service from airlines via Twitter (RIP) than I did by phone That's the problem, not the solution. Why the hell was this the case? I guess be

> I got far better service from airlines via Twitter (RIP) than I did by phone That's the problem, not the solution. Why the hell was this the case? I guess because it was public. Either way it sucks. Obviously (good) CS should be via a private channel.

solarkraft 3y ago
> Obviously (good) CS should be via a private channel Exactly the opposite. The interaction being public keeps companies (a bit more) accountable and that can do wonders.
EGG_CREAM 3y ago
Customer service issues generally get escalated when someone starts advocating against your company, as there is now a tangible cost involved in not fixing the issue. Companies saw people hurting their reputation on twitter and wanted to be able to respond to prevent and minimize damage. It makes sense that if someone complains publicly, you would want to respond publicly, at least initially.
tiznow 3y ago
Says who? Dozens or hundreds or thousands of people putting pressure on a company to act right when they screw over a customer is good, actually.
- manquer 3y ago
  Problem is then company is going to only act if they are HN front page or enough people tweet and put pressure then it is not a viable solution for most of us without the social media connections to make that happen. Also forcing people to use a social media platform to raise a support ticket for something completely unrelated to media or even tech is not a good thing. Not every user of a product (say a kitchen appliance) is going to even know how to use social media
- itishappy 3y ago
  Good for us, that's for sure, but the companies may see things differently.
bobthepanda 3y ago
CS is like publicity; in the modern era you need to reach lots of channels, because your customers may not prefer to dial a phone.
- lamontcg 3y ago
  The companies are all hostile towards customers finding out how to privately contact them in order to cut their customer support. That trend started before the trend of smartphones/texting/mobile.
- yamazakiwi 3y ago
  Or you can also take the Google approach and minimize and obfuscate channels for support communication.
jasonlotito 3y ago
Initial contact would be public. Followup would be private. Much easier, not needing to create yet another account on some CS site, and a much better app experience via DM on Twitter. > Either way it sucks. Nah, it was great. Lots of people really liked it. Keep in mind, it generally wasn't the only option for support, but an option you could choose.
- itishappy 3y ago
  > Nah, it was great. Lots of people really liked it. That's great! Except now it's gone and you've spent years conditioning all of your users to complain publicly about any issues instead of using your customer support service, and you've just lost the ability to send replies. Is that a bug? Who knows! You can't fix it either way.

solarkraft 3y ago

> Obviously (good) CS should be via a private channel Exactly the opposite. The interaction being public keeps companies (a bit more) accountable and that can do wonders.

EGG_CREAM 3y ago

Customer service issues generally get escalated when someone starts advocating against your company, as there is now a tangible cost involved in not fixing the issue. Companies saw people hurting their reputation on twitter and wanted to be able to respond to prevent and minimize damage. It makes sense that if someone complains publicly, you would want to respond publicly, at least initially.

tiznow 3y ago

Says who? Dozens or hundreds or thousands of people putting pressure on a company to act right when they screw over a customer is good, actually.

manquer 3y ago
Problem is then company is going to only act if they are HN front page or enough people tweet and put pressure then it is not a viable solution for most of us without the social media connections to make that happen. Also forcing people to use a social media platform to raise a support ticket for something completely unrelated to media or even tech is not a good thing. Not every user of a product (say a kitchen appliance) is going to even know how to use social media
itishappy 3y ago
Good for us, that's for sure, but the companies may see things differently.

bobthepanda 3y ago

CS is like publicity; in the modern era you need to reach lots of channels, because your customers may not prefer to dial a phone.

lamontcg 3y ago
The companies are all hostile towards customers finding out how to privately contact them in order to cut their customer support. That trend started before the trend of smartphones/texting/mobile.
yamazakiwi 3y ago
Or you can also take the Google approach and minimize and obfuscate channels for support communication.

jasonlotito 3y ago

Initial contact would be public. Followup would be private. Much easier, not needing to create yet another account on some CS site, and a much better app experience via DM on Twitter. > Either way it sucks. Nah, it was great. Lots of people really liked it. Keep in mind, it generally wasn't the only option for support, but an option you could choose.

itishappy 3y ago
> Nah, it was great. Lots of people really liked it. That's great! Except now it's gone and you've spent years conditioning all of your users to complain publicly about any issues instead of using your customer support service, and you've just lost the ability to send replies. Is that a bug? Who knows! You can't fix it either way.