5 ms·
Fallout 2, 3 and 4 and new vegas are all excellent games with really deep PRG fun in them. definitely on my classics list.
by senectus1 3y ago
Fallout 2, 3 and 4 and new vegas are all excellent games with really deep PRG fun in them. definitely on my classics list.
- viraptor 3y agoOne of those wasn't that deep unfortunately. I hope they won't go the way of 4.
- footlose_3815 3y ago3 and NV are the shining stars of that series. 4 was shallow but beautiful. I bet they are going to spend a couple episodes building a base.
- orwin 3y agoThe main quest of 4 was shallow, but i really loved the idea behind Minutemen and the raiders (and Nuka world was nice), and the Far harbor DLC was really good (flashback of Necropolis). The idea behind the cryogenized survivor was interesting, but imho they flunked both the main "villain" and the synth idea. Once again i found that the Brotherhood is just a bad idea 99% of the time (with the exception of what was done in NV, each game it was just lazy writing), but this time it's just a useless faction (except for the "Giant robot fight with PA" part, but tbh, that could have worked as a Railroad vs Institute without the Brotherhood ever being mentionned). The Railroad idea could have been good, but their opposition (the institute) brought them down, and finally, the only faction who does not suffer that much lore-wise from the poor main storyline are the Minutemen, because like the Brotherhood, they are not _really_ involved with the synth, but unlike the BH, they have another reason to be here. Didn't love the 3 either. I did like ?Megaton city? (sorry, i had the game in French the last time i played) better than most places in NV and 4, but except for that, the alien stuff, the submarine... I think Oblivion had better writing sometimes (i'm joking, but not that much). Just thinking about that makes me want to play Morrowind again, i think i would totally buy a remaster on a newer engine :/ I'm a sucker sometimes.
- D13Fd 3y agoFallout 1 was excellent too, and the series still suffers from the decisions made in Fallout 2 - particularly the timeline jump, the tribals, and the Enclave (which is fun but even more implausible than many of the series' other elements). Fallout 1 was 84 years after the war, and it was easier to imagine that functioning structures, robots etc. still exist. Fallout 2 was set 164 years after the blast, sadly, and the rest of the series has been stuck there for continuity's sake.
- sidewndr46 3y agois there a way to play New Vegas on PC? The last time I tried it there was some issue with more than 2 enemy characters being involved in combat at any time. The frame rate would drop to less than 10.
- viraptor 3y agohttps://store.steampowered.com/app/22380/Fallout_New_Vegas/ https://store.steampowered.com/app/22380/Fallout_New_Vegas/ It just works as far as I remember. A good time to grab a bundle at a discount as well.
- muhwalt 3y agoUsing the Viva New Vegas Guide, you can get a very functional install of New Vegas. I'd recommend the steam version, because most mods are made for that one. https://vivanewvegas.moddinglinked.com/index.html https://vivanewvegas.moddinglinked.com/index.html
- m463 3y agono drm on gog. On sale now $6.59 https://www.gog.com/en/game/fallout_new_vegas_ultimate_edition https://www.gog.com/en/game/fallout_new_vegas_ultimate_editi...
- sidewndr46 3y agoI'm not sure DRM has anything to do with it. From what I can New Vegas on PC uses a N-squared approach for enemy AI or something like that.