3 ms·
And for hiding the activities of pedophiles and terrorists. Encryption isn't solely beneficial to human rights, it enables considerable harm to be shielded fro
by controversiview 3y ago
And for hiding the activities of pedophiles and terrorists.
Encryption isn't solely beneficial to human rights, it enables considerable harm to be shielded from scrutiny. There has to be a balance with the extent to which applications of encryption are permitted in society.
- haolez 3y agoWithout encryption, the pedophiles and terrorists have access to your communication as well. Not a very bright world.
- techbrovanguard 3y agoyou aren’t very bright, are you?
- sampli 3y agoBased on their username, I assume they play devils advocate
- BLKNSLVR 3y agoCars, guns, knives, sharp sticks, rocks, language, religion, belief, opinion, cigarettes, sugar, bad parenting, divorce, marriage. Ban 'em all! Humanity's evils pre-date technology, therefore banning technology will not remove them. I'd also go on to say that many of the examples I've listed above have more to do with the creation of both terrorists and pedophiles, by a very wide margin, than encryption. Problems that are hard to solve inevitably have scapegoat solutions thrown at them.
- userbinator 3y agoBan 'em all! Sadly, I have already observed that exact opinion strongly advocated for on here for several of the things on that list.
- tjpnz 3y agoWithout encryption pedophiles have access to your family photos. One innocent photograph of a toddler bathing could become the gratification of a sex criminal.
- Moldoteck 3y agoIf communication isn't encrypted, this means pedos have a higher chance to get that data either through mitm or through some more esoteric method if encryption exists but it has a backdoor. If a backdoor exists, it will be used