3 ms·
> Quite sure you answered your own question here. Survivorship bias isn't a valid argument. Lebanon, Greece, Pakistan, Turkey all come to mind in the last decad
by throw0101c 3y ago
> Quite sure you answered your own question here. Survivorship bias isn't a valid argument. Lebanon, Greece, Pakistan, Turkey all come to mind in the last decade, all with unsustainable amounts of debt.
Incompetent government is the higher risk.
And with Greece, the problem was only partly created by themselves: it was also the French and Germans who insisted that their bankers (who held a large portion of Greece's bond) be paid back and were willing to blackmail the Greek government. This is evidenced by the fact it all went away when the ECB said (Draghi: "whatever it takes") it would be the lender of last (like the US Fed is).
- chii 3y ago> Incompetent government is the higher risk. or wrong incentives in gov't. Those countries that was listed in the quoted comment are basically subsiding large portions of the people - fuel, food, public sector 'jobs' (non-productive jobs), etc - and funded it via debt. I guess incompetence and 'malice' are indistinguishable at some point.