4 ms·

I'm so annoyed at myself that I fell for the Winklevoss's unregistered security [1] Gemini Earn program. It really should have been obvious to me that the 7+% i

I'm so annoyed at myself that I fell for the Winklevoss's unregistered security [1] Gemini Earn program. It really should have been obvious to me that the 7+% interest they were offering (while every real bank was doing like 0.5%) was unsustainable, but I kept seeing FDIC-backed flashed on their website in regards to GUSD and didn't do the ample due diligence before giving them my money. Now I'm somewhere about $13,000 poorer, and hopefully slightly wiser. It makes me glad that these douchebags might actually have to pay consequences for their actions. [1] Not my opinion, but the SEC's https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2023-7 https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2023-7

toomuchtodo 3y ago
It's not entirely your fault. This is what regulators and regulation are for, which obviously should've moved much faster to avoid consumer and investor harm. It is unreasonable to expect individuals to be sophisticated capital market participants in the face of fraudulent marketing efforts. There is a reason fiduciaries exist [1], as well as whole piles of capital market licenses [2]. This is a natural outcome of less than honest folks leveraging information asymmetry in a complex system. [1] https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-is-a-fiduciary-en-1769/ https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-is-a-fiduciary... [2] https://www.finra.org/registration-exams-ce/qualification-exams https://www.finra.org/registration-exams-ce/qualification-ex...
- ptmcc 3y ago
  Sure, regulators could have moved faster, but the crypto community was pushing out so much bullshit so quickly that even excellent regulators would be overwhelmed short of an all-out ban which would require enforcement to have any teeth anyway. And as we are seeing with all the FTX fallout, of course they were giving money to all sides of politicians along the way. Yes good regulations are needed to prevent this sort of garbage, and I fully support that, but there is still some amount of responsibility on people to distrust "too good to be true" scams especially on new complicated "just trust me bro" schemes. There were tons of people warning against this all along.
- tombert 3y ago
  Yeah, and you know, I'm a yuppie software engineer with a relatively well-diversified investment portfolio (and a good amount of savings in safe things like T-Bills), so I'll be totally fine, albeit extremely annoyed. What's really upsetting is this lie that these crypto people push, acting like cryptocurrency is the secret way to leave poverty, and that this is the future of finance, and that investing with "Gemini Earn GUSD pays like 50x more than traditional bank interest", in combination with the FDIC-insurance for GUSD on their site. I think it's possible that people put in more than they could afford to lose into GUSD and Gemini Earn. I think it's also possible that people transferred most of their savings from traditional FDIC-insured banks in order to take advantage of Gemini Earn. And I think it's very possible that this is going to hurt the poorest individuals substantially more than anyone else. I generally don't advocate for violence, but a large part of me really hopes that the Winklevoss twins each step on a Lego block every morning.
  - JumpCrisscross 3y ago
    Might I make the meta comment that this is a heart-warming thread?
    - toomuchtodo 3y ago
      The ayes have it and the motion is carried.
  - 15457345234 3y ago
    > What's really upsetting is this lie that these crypto people push Yeah, thieving scum are upsetting to normal good people.
- wolverine876 3y ago
  The crypto sales people were obvious, brazen, proud con artists, and everyone talked about what a scam it was. I'm sure some especially unsophisticated people were unaware of it, but plenty knew and decided to take the risk anyway.
  - 15457345234 3y ago
    > everyone talked about what a scam it was The problem is, 'everyone' didn't. Mostly-reputable finance sources were cranking out article after article on smart contracts and the crypto ecosystem etc which made the whole thing sound just as legitimate as any other part of the regulated sector. A truly immense amount of whitewashing occurred and trickled down from on high, it was everywhere and it continues to this day. Unfortunately blatant scamming appears to have become very normalised in what were previously relatively high-trust societies.
    - wolverine876 3y ago
      I think that rejecting and trashing the 'high-trust' aspects are a specific goal of the broader cultural movement of which crypto scams are just one symptom.
      - 15457345234 3y ago
        Yup, and it's coming from a few specific places. I actually blocked reddit on my router the other day after encountering way too many 'if you see somebody stealing, no you didn't' comments in a thread. It really was the tipping point and something I should have done a long time ago.
        wolverine876 3y ago
        If you mean it's also coming from the left (?), I don't think that's meaningful. The crypto uber-libertarian, ubermensch culture runs much of SV, significant parts of Wall Street, has run the White House, etc. The left-wing side has power - where? Nothing within orders of magnitude of the other source.
sillysaurusx 3y ago
I lost $11k in Gox, the entire sum of what my father had saved up for me after many years. Feeling the realization of what I’d done was traumatic, and in hindsight $11k was an ok price to pay for such a lesson. It takes many years to get over the self-blame, but once you do, you end up being much more shrewd. I’d like to say that it made me make better bets, but honestly I never speculated again after that. And it’s easy to imagine me having never learned that lesson and dumping >$40k of savings into TSLA shorts (or other obviously-crazy-in-hindsight plays) and getting hit harder at a time when I can least afford it. Also watched a friend along with a former coworker both get rich on bitcoin and live the easy life. Last I heard from the friend, he was still trying to find a relationship he liked, and the former coworker seems to spend all his time and energy talking about nothing but bitcoin on Twitter. I’m grateful I channeled that into family and learning ML instead. I don’t know if any of this is helpful context for you, but the overall point is that it’s entirely possible to view this as a positive event, even though it feels really crummy right now. It’s hard to predict how it will affect your decisions in the long run, and you might end up much happier than you otherwise might’ve been. Obviously there’s a measure of self-deception here, since almost everybody will try to jump through mental hoops to justify any poor decision that causes great harm to their life. But once you stop justifying it and start healing, you’ll start to realize that $14k is a rounding error in the grand scheme of life (and that we’re very fortunate to be able to feel like that about such a sum of money), and that at the very least it’s not worth kicking yourself for too long.
- gosub100 3y ago
  > get rich on bitcoin And what do they pay for all their rich-person-lifestyle stuff with? USD (or the fiat of whatever nation they reside in).
  - seaal 3y ago
    When will I finally be able to pay for my Starbucks latte with partial Microsoft stock?
  - rokkitmensch 3y ago
    Naturally! Bought with Bitcoin couriered in without having to endure onerous capital controls.
nfRfqX5n 3y ago
not sure if due diligence would've helped you. you would've had to foresee the entanglement leading all the way back to FTX and predicting their collapse. really crazy that Gemini can still operate in new york with so many customers jammed up
- tombert 3y ago
  I definitely should have investigated their FDIC claims more thoroughly, though I do think being misleading about that should have pretty strong consequences. I'm also kind of surprised NYC hasn't suspended their license yet, at least until the SEC lawsuit comes to a conclusion.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
- jncfhnb 3y ago
  It’s strange to see people argue that the claims about crypto firms being obvious crooks are still not credible in retrospect of them having collapsed.
TacticalCoder 3y ago
> It really should have been obvious to me that the 7+% interest they were offering (while every real bank was doing like 0.5%) was unsustainable Gemini may be a victim here too, as TFA explains: it's Genesis that ran the scam (with DCG being Genesis' parent company). I think the Winklevoss brothers honestly "saw" Bitcoin before most, just like they saw FaceBook before Zuckerberg stole it from them (Zuckerberg lost not just one but two lawsuits against the twins). They may have been blinded by Genesis/DCG: just like, say, the New-York Times and Forbes got blinded by SBF / FTX. But I don't think it's fair to say, especially while there's a lawsuit ongoing, that you "fell" for it: they are likely just victims of Genesis (and the lawsuit shall try to determine if that's the case or not). Now they may have sold unregistered securities, but that's very different compared to downright theft (like Genesis or SBF or so many others did). That said I'm sorry about the $13 K loss and if it's any consolation I told someone close to GFTO of BlockFi because these 8% were obviously a scam (and I don't think BlockFi was guilty: they fell for the Genesis scam) and he managed to get his 1 BTC out of BlockFi before things went south (not too sure what eventually happened to BlockFi and people who had funds there).
- guiambros 3y ago
  Yes, but they may get sacked for this: > "But according to the lawsuit, in the summer of 2022, some top Gemini staff became worried enough to withdraw their own funds. If senior executives traded their own assets based on non-public information, it'll be hard to claim that they are just a victim of Genesis/DCG and had no idea this was happening.
- tombert 3y ago
  I can agree with most of what you're saying, but there is a sticking point that I take issue with. > Now they may have sold unregistered securities, but that's very different compared to downright theft (like Genesis or SBF or so many others did). I mean, is it? They compared it directly to a bank account [1], and mentioned FDIC insurance for GUSD [2]. They might have not meant for my money to be stolen, but I am quite confident that they were playing fast and loose with terms in order for me to believe that there was lower risk in this than there actually was. There's actually a word for "purposefully making someone believe something that's not true", and it's called "lying", and if they're lying then I kind of have to assume some nefarious intent. That said, I can broadly agree that maybe they're just morons? I'm probably an idiot too, but it's a little different for a software engineer without any financial training vs. two adults trying to start "legitimate" crypto exchange without doing the proper due diligence to make sure their partners are also legitimate? [1] https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F1lMbFqWIAAcpKc?format=jpg&name=large https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F1lMbFqWIAAcpKc?format=jpg&name=... [2] https://web.archive.org/web/20211201224824/https://www.gemini.com/dollar https://web.archive.org/web/20211201224824/https://www.gemin...

toomuchtodo 3y ago

It's not entirely your fault. This is what regulators and regulation are for, which obviously should've moved much faster to avoid consumer and investor harm. It is unreasonable to expect individuals to be sophisticated capital market participants in the face of fraudulent marketing efforts. There is a reason fiduciaries exist [1], as well as whole piles of capital market licenses [2]. This is a natural outcome of less than honest folks leveraging information asymmetry in a complex system. [1] https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-is-a-fiduciary-en-1769/ https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-is-a-fiduciary... [2] https://www.finra.org/registration-exams-ce/qualification-exams https://www.finra.org/registration-exams-ce/qualification-ex...

ptmcc 3y ago
Sure, regulators could have moved faster, but the crypto community was pushing out so much bullshit so quickly that even excellent regulators would be overwhelmed short of an all-out ban which would require enforcement to have any teeth anyway. And as we are seeing with all the FTX fallout, of course they were giving money to all sides of politicians along the way. Yes good regulations are needed to prevent this sort of garbage, and I fully support that, but there is still some amount of responsibility on people to distrust "too good to be true" scams especially on new complicated "just trust me bro" schemes. There were tons of people warning against this all along.
tombert 3y ago
Yeah, and you know, I'm a yuppie software engineer with a relatively well-diversified investment portfolio (and a good amount of savings in safe things like T-Bills), so I'll be totally fine, albeit extremely annoyed. What's really upsetting is this lie that these crypto people push, acting like cryptocurrency is the secret way to leave poverty, and that this is the future of finance, and that investing with "Gemini Earn GUSD pays like 50x more than traditional bank interest", in combination with the FDIC-insurance for GUSD on their site. I think it's possible that people put in more than they could afford to lose into GUSD and Gemini Earn. I think it's also possible that people transferred most of their savings from traditional FDIC-insured banks in order to take advantage of Gemini Earn. And I think it's very possible that this is going to hurt the poorest individuals substantially more than anyone else. I generally don't advocate for violence, but a large part of me really hopes that the Winklevoss twins each step on a Lego block every morning.
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago
  Might I make the meta comment that this is a heart-warming thread?
  - toomuchtodo 3y ago
    The ayes have it and the motion is carried.
- 15457345234 3y ago
  > What's really upsetting is this lie that these crypto people push Yeah, thieving scum are upsetting to normal good people.
wolverine876 3y ago
The crypto sales people were obvious, brazen, proud con artists, and everyone talked about what a scam it was. I'm sure some especially unsophisticated people were unaware of it, but plenty knew and decided to take the risk anyway.
- 15457345234 3y ago
  > everyone talked about what a scam it was The problem is, 'everyone' didn't. Mostly-reputable finance sources were cranking out article after article on smart contracts and the crypto ecosystem etc which made the whole thing sound just as legitimate as any other part of the regulated sector. A truly immense amount of whitewashing occurred and trickled down from on high, it was everywhere and it continues to this day. Unfortunately blatant scamming appears to have become very normalised in what were previously relatively high-trust societies.
  - wolverine876 3y ago
    I think that rejecting and trashing the 'high-trust' aspects are a specific goal of the broader cultural movement of which crypto scams are just one symptom.
    - 15457345234 3y ago
      Yup, and it's coming from a few specific places. I actually blocked reddit on my router the other day after encountering way too many 'if you see somebody stealing, no you didn't' comments in a thread. It really was the tipping point and something I should have done a long time ago.
      - wolverine876 3y ago
        If you mean it's also coming from the left (?), I don't think that's meaningful. The crypto uber-libertarian, ubermensch culture runs much of SV, significant parts of Wall Street, has run the White House, etc. The left-wing side has power - where? Nothing within orders of magnitude of the other source.

sillysaurusx 3y ago

I lost $11k in Gox, the entire sum of what my father had saved up for me after many years. Feeling the realization of what I’d done was traumatic, and in hindsight $11k was an ok price to pay for such a lesson. It takes many years to get over the self-blame, but once you do, you end up being much more shrewd. I’d like to say that it made me make better bets, but honestly I never speculated again after that. And it’s easy to imagine me having never learned that lesson and dumping >$40k of savings into TSLA shorts (or other obviously-crazy-in-hindsight plays) and getting hit harder at a time when I can least afford it. Also watched a friend along with a former coworker both get rich on bitcoin and live the easy life. Last I heard from the friend, he was still trying to find a relationship he liked, and the former coworker seems to spend all his time and energy talking about nothing but bitcoin on Twitter. I’m grateful I channeled that into family and learning ML instead. I don’t know if any of this is helpful context for you, but the overall point is that it’s entirely possible to view this as a positive event, even though it feels really crummy right now. It’s hard to predict how it will affect your decisions in the long run, and you might end up much happier than you otherwise might’ve been. Obviously there’s a measure of self-deception here, since almost everybody will try to jump through mental hoops to justify any poor decision that causes great harm to their life. But once you stop justifying it and start healing, you’ll start to realize that $14k is a rounding error in the grand scheme of life (and that we’re very fortunate to be able to feel like that about such a sum of money), and that at the very least it’s not worth kicking yourself for too long.

gosub100 3y ago
> get rich on bitcoin And what do they pay for all their rich-person-lifestyle stuff with? USD (or the fiat of whatever nation they reside in).
- seaal 3y ago
  When will I finally be able to pay for my Starbucks latte with partial Microsoft stock?
- rokkitmensch 3y ago
  Naturally! Bought with Bitcoin couriered in without having to endure onerous capital controls.

nfRfqX5n 3y ago

not sure if due diligence would've helped you. you would've had to foresee the entanglement leading all the way back to FTX and predicting their collapse. really crazy that Gemini can still operate in new york with so many customers jammed up

tombert 3y ago
I definitely should have investigated their FDIC claims more thoroughly, though I do think being misleading about that should have pretty strong consequences. I'm also kind of surprised NYC hasn't suspended their license yet, at least until the SEC lawsuit comes to a conclusion.
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
jncfhnb 3y ago
It’s strange to see people argue that the claims about crypto firms being obvious crooks are still not credible in retrospect of them having collapsed.

TacticalCoder 3y ago

> It really should have been obvious to me that the 7+% interest they were offering (while every real bank was doing like 0.5%) was unsustainable Gemini may be a victim here too, as TFA explains: it's Genesis that ran the scam (with DCG being Genesis' parent company). I think the Winklevoss brothers honestly "saw" Bitcoin before most, just like they saw FaceBook before Zuckerberg stole it from them (Zuckerberg lost not just one but two lawsuits against the twins). They may have been blinded by Genesis/DCG: just like, say, the New-York Times and Forbes got blinded by SBF / FTX. But I don't think it's fair to say, especially while there's a lawsuit ongoing, that you "fell" for it: they are likely just victims of Genesis (and the lawsuit shall try to determine if that's the case or not). Now they may have sold unregistered securities, but that's very different compared to downright theft (like Genesis or SBF or so many others did). That said I'm sorry about the $13 K loss and if it's any consolation I told someone close to GFTO of BlockFi because these 8% were obviously a scam (and I don't think BlockFi was guilty: they fell for the Genesis scam) and he managed to get his 1 BTC out of BlockFi before things went south (not too sure what eventually happened to BlockFi and people who had funds there).

guiambros 3y ago
Yes, but they may get sacked for this: > "But according to the lawsuit, in the summer of 2022, some top Gemini staff became worried enough to withdraw their own funds. If senior executives traded their own assets based on non-public information, it'll be hard to claim that they are just a victim of Genesis/DCG and had no idea this was happening.
tombert 3y ago
I can agree with most of what you're saying, but there is a sticking point that I take issue with. > Now they may have sold unregistered securities, but that's very different compared to downright theft (like Genesis or SBF or so many others did). I mean, is it? They compared it directly to a bank account [1], and mentioned FDIC insurance for GUSD [2]. They might have not meant for my money to be stolen, but I am quite confident that they were playing fast and loose with terms in order for me to believe that there was lower risk in this than there actually was. There's actually a word for "purposefully making someone believe something that's not true", and it's called "lying", and if they're lying then I kind of have to assume some nefarious intent. That said, I can broadly agree that maybe they're just morons? I'm probably an idiot too, but it's a little different for a software engineer without any financial training vs. two adults trying to start "legitimate" crypto exchange without doing the proper due diligence to make sure their partners are also legitimate? [1] https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F1lMbFqWIAAcpKc?format=jpg&name=large https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F1lMbFqWIAAcpKc?format=jpg&name=... [2] https://web.archive.org/web/20211201224824/https://www.gemini.com/dollar https://web.archive.org/web/20211201224824/https://www.gemin...