3 ms·
Although they detected life on earth, I don't see how they could have evaluated the false positive rate of their methods. Better would be some data from Earth,
by canjobear 3y ago
Although they detected life on earth, I don't see how they could have evaluated the false positive rate of their methods. Better would be some data from Earth, paired with data of the same resolution from a matched lifeless planet, and then the scientists have to figure out which one has life without knowing which is which.
- amelius 3y agoStill too easy to overfit.