> What a ridiculous comment. See HN comment guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html @dan

> What a ridiculous comment. See HN comment guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html @dang >You get the tagline hilariously wrong Both taglines were in use. See NY times article "Yes, We Mean Literally Abolish the Police" https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/12/opinion/sunday/floyd-abolish-defund-police.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/12/opinion/sunday/floyd-abol... >your example is someone committing a non violent crime that the federal government handles anyway? Are you saying that people suspected of counterfeiting should not be arrested? Or do you believe it's fine to arrest them, as long as the arrest is performed by federal employees rather than city employees? If so, why is that supposed to make a difference? >Do an ounce of research into the existing programs and ideas. If you make a claim the burden of proof is on you to support it.