>> I assume the answer to that will be that there is no need to differentiate between them. And honestly, I agree with that >I disagree. The point is to reduce

>> I assume the answer to that will be that there is no need to differentiate between them. And honestly, I agree with that >I disagree. The point is to reduce actual child abuse. There are limited resources, practically the only way to do this is to make it illegal to have anything that looks real (or looks derived from a real situation, in a 'I will know it when I see it way'). Otherwise, you're just making an almost impassable defence of 'it is fake' or 'I thought it was fake'. Then you can't practically reduce actual child abuse.