7 ms·
I think the weird thing about this is that it's completely true right now but in X months it may be totally outdated advice. For example, efforts like OpenMOE
by ilaksh 3y ago
I think the weird thing about this is that it's completely true right now but in X months it may be totally outdated advice.
For example, efforts like OpenMOE https://github.com/XueFuzhao/OpenMoE https://github.com/XueFuzhao/OpenMoE or similar will probably eventually lead to very competitive performance and cost-effectiveness for open source models. At least in terms of competing with GPT-3.5 for many applications.
Also see https://laion.ai/ https://laion.ai/
I also believe that within say 1-3 years there will be a different type of training approach that does not require such large datasets or manual human feedback.
- sidnb13 3y ago> I also believe that within say 1-3 years there will be a different type of training approach that does not require such large datasets or manual human feedback. I guess if we ignore pretraining, don't sample-efficient fine-tuning on carefully curated instruction datasets sort of achieve this? LIMA and OpenOrca show some really promising results to date.
- sharemywin 3y agodistilbert was trained from Bert. there might be an angle using another model to train the model especially if your trying to get something to run locally.
- nico 3y ago> I also believe that within say 1-3 years there will be a different type of training approach that does not require such large datasets or manual human feedback This makes a lot of sense. A small model that “knows” enough English and a couple of programming languages should be enough for it to replace something like copilot, or use plug-ins or do RAG on a substantially larger dataset The issue right now is that to get a model that can do those things, the current algorithms still need massive amounts of data, way more than what the final user needs
- Dwedit 3y agoAbbreviate Mix of Experts as "MoE" and the Anime fans immediately start rushing in...