>This comparison seems to be not exactly fair? Amazon’s 126 million queries per second was purely for Amazon-related services serving Prime Day generating this

>This comparison seems to be not exactly fair? Amazon’s 126 million queries per second was purely for Amazon-related services serving Prime Day generating this on DynamoDB, and not all of AWS is my read. There's no indication that google is talking about ALL of spanner either? The examples they list are all internal google services, and they specifically say "inside google". I'm also dubious that even with all of the AWS usage accounted for that DynamoDB tops Spanner if Amazon themselves are only at 126 million queries per second on Prime Day.