4 ms·
It's good, then, that the non-profit pharmaceutical company called Civica Rx will manufacture the insulin under the brand CalRx.
by isykt 3y ago
It's good, then, that the non-profit pharmaceutical company called Civica Rx will manufacture the insulin under the brand CalRx.
- henriquez 3y agoCalifornia nonprofits are typically a special breed of corruption.
- refulgentis 3y agoThrowaway quip tripling down on vague aspersions about something good. Sometimes things are good.
- afavour 3y agoI feel like we’re trying very hard to dislike a good thing here
- lazide 3y agoHave you lived in California?
- afavour 3y agoHave you Googled Civica Rx? > Headquarters: Lehi, UT
- lazide 3y agoWhat does that have to do with living in California? And you know they have no track record yet right? They didn’t even exist until 2018! The perennial issue is big promises, total shit delivery, way over budget and late - if ever. Regardless of where the subcontractor lives. They’ve already been talking about the insulin plan for several years. But hey, maybe 2024 is the new promise. Have you heard about our ‘high speed rail’ project, for instance? It isn’t even high speed anymore!
- afavour 3y agoYou didn't say living in California, you said "California non-profits". But sure, keep moving the goalposts if it makes you happy. Why are you even still living there?
- lazide 3y agoNo I didn’t. I asked if you had lived in California. Explicitly. Go ahead, read the comment again.
- afavour 3y agoOh, I see, I assumed you were the OP continuing a conversation. But no, you’re not the OP, you’re someone else that came into the thread to ask a question you yourself admit has nothing to do with the thread. Yeah, I’m done here, later.
- lazide 3y agoAnd how does your lack of experience with California not have anything to do with your claims about California’s gov’t programs effectiveness?
- djur 3y agoGood thing it's a Utah nonprofit, then.
- teaearlgraycold 3y agoFucking got'em
- askiiart 3y agoCould you provide any information on that, rather than just vague remarks? Or more helpfully, information regarding CalRx specifically? If you provided a link showing that some of its leadership had a history of corruption, that would be one thing, but instead we got an unsourced quip about "California nonprofits."