3 ms·
>I also don't think ... that training on a book or image decreases the market for the original book or image. ... zero folks that want to read Game of Thrones a
by pbhjpbhj 3y ago
>I also don't think ... that training on a book or image decreases the market for the original book or image. ... zero folks that want to read Game of Thrones are asking ChatGPT to generate Game of Thrones ...
For now. But when you can generate work in the style of an artist without paying that artist, I would. More importantly, media production companies will and so will use access to people's post work to put them out of work now.
We need to distribute the benefits, we're drifting towards copyright infringement being allowed by rich corporation (with resources to generate "AI") as long as they abstract it through a transformer, or whatever.
- antifa 3y agoCrypto was a decentralized ponzi scheme. AI will be decentralized mass copyright infringement.
- artninja1988 3y agoCopyright laws are fascist and should be abolished
- Turing_Machine 3y ago> But when you can generate work in the style of an artist without paying that artist, I would. You can't copyright a "style".