4 ms·
“Efficiency” for whom and for what? Think deep before you all bow down before our overlords and ditch clear and simple protocols for “efficiency”. I know what
by SanderNL 3y ago
“Efficiency” for whom and for what? Think deep before you all bow down before our overlords and ditch clear and simple protocols for “efficiency”.
I know what QUIC is for and I know it’s strengths. I just want the web to be simple and accessible. It’s great Netflix and friends can stream content efficiently. It’s another thing to push this to the “open web” and declare it The Protocol.
- Dylan16807 3y agoSometimes a webpage just wants to have a bunch of images, which is not a bad thing, and something like this helps it load better. > It’s great Netflix and friends can stream content efficiently. This barely affects streaming. Streams work fine with a single TCP connection.