3 ms·
The OP's assertion lacks foundation, and hence can correctly be classified as "baseless". If the OP has proof then they should come forward with it; if the OP l
by tankenmate 3y ago
The OP's assertion lacks foundation, and hence can correctly be classified as "baseless". If the OP has proof then they should come forward with it; if the OP lacks proof then ipso facto it is "baseless".
- Dylan16807 3y agoThe foundation is the information in the article. Saying it has no foundation, ipso facto it is baseless, is just laundering your subjective opinion to make it sound objective.
- Pyramus 3y agoYou are confusing "no base" with "no evidence". A basis can also be logical support. And OP has outlined the logical (decision theoretical) foundations of their reasoning pretty clearly.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]