3 ms·

GPT-4 should do significantly better, but still worse than expert humans, on the tasks you mentioned. They would also benefit from good prompting, such as those

GPT-4 should do significantly better, but still worse than expert humans, on the tasks you mentioned. They would also benefit from good prompting, such as those in - https://lilianweng.github.io/posts/2023-03-15-prompt-engineering https://lilianweng.github.io/posts/2023-03-15-prompt-enginee... - https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6654000-best-practices-for-prompt-engineering-with-openai-api https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6654000-best-practices-f... Not a large percentage of humans would be able to do the tasks listed above without significant experience or training either. Average humans are also not great at reasoning.

fipar 3y ago
Thanks, I'll wait for it to be available (I'm a casual user and I'm not the one setting this up or paying for it, if someone is paying for it, so I'm not in control of which version I use). I'm in full agreement about humans and reasoning, btw. I just don't think chatgpt (with the version I've used) is anywhere on the same league as the worst (way below-average) humans either. I do think it's quite useful as a writing aid. You do need to review what it gives you, but you'd have to do that even if you were relying on a human writing aid.
- baq 3y ago
  Try Bing chat, it has a GPT-4 mode, which you have to look for but it’s there and free.