3 ms·
> It's not expensive enough to be worth leaving out in basically any car. > Basic security shouldn't be a premium feature. That’s your opinion presented as a
by vuln 3y ago
> It's not expensive enough to be worth leaving out in basically any car.
> Basic security shouldn't be a premium feature.
That’s your opinion presented as a fact.
- Dylan16807 3y agoIt is, which is pretty normal for opinion posts. But your argument that this is okay is also an opinion.
- vuln 3y agoI’m stating the manufacturer did not advertise this security feature, nor did any of the purchasers really care until their cars started getting stolen and used to cause mayhem. You stated a basic security feature such as an immobilizer should be installed by default because it’s cheap. Am I missing something?
- Dylan16807 3y agoThe implication of "it would be one thing" and "you get what you pay for" is that this product offering is acceptable. Which is an opinion. If there was no implication intended, then "it would be one thing if X" would be a tautology. Which wouldn't make sense as a post. And then in contrast, my opinion is that this product offering is not acceptable.
- dontlaugh 3y agoIt’s the law in most countries. It is a fact, averaged out globally.