4 ms·
The first three items I mentioned were regarding the vaccine itself…namely the speed at which it was developed, the release from liability to manufacturers, and
by lp0_on_fire 3y ago
The first three items I mentioned were regarding the vaccine itself…namely the speed at which it was developed, the release from liability to manufacturers, and the outright lie that it was 100% effective.
Perhaps in your eagerness to get to the “deserved to be insulted” part of your response you missed that?
- Dylan16807 3y agoSpecifically, you said "questionable and overstated results". The speed and release from liability don't fit that. The "outright lie that it was 100% effective" falls under overstated. So I wanted to know what you meant by "questionable" in addition to "overstated". So no, I didn't miss that. And I didn't write that comment in a rush, just to be clear.
- lp0_on_fire 3y agoIt’s pretty clear you’re more interested in gotchas than discourse. This conversation is over. Have a pleasant evening.
- Dylan16807 3y agoWhat gotchas? You said a thing, I asked for clarification, your reply made me realize that I had misunderstood. Hence "oh I thought you were talking about". I was happy at that point! Everything was settled! I'm not trying to get you in any way at all. I just replied because you said I skipped things, but I didn't skip them.