5 ms·
Which belief system is more absurd, one which the adherents maintain or gain in population, or one which they go extinct? Which one is more fit to the environm
by influx 3y ago
Which belief system is more absurd, one which the adherents maintain or gain in population, or one which they go extinct?
Which one is more fit to the environment?
- standardUser 3y agoIf you have a point to make, feel free to make it.
- geraldwhen 3y agoAll belief systems are equally absurd.
- wizofaus 3y agoSounds like one of those "having no belief system is a still a belief system" type arguments...
- arvinsim 3y agoTo worship is part of being human. If people don't find anything else worthy of worship, then they simply worship themselves.
- wizofaus 3y ago"To worship is part of being human." Proof for that? I don't deny is has been a big part of much of human existence over the millennia, but there's zero evidence it's a necessary part of our very being.
- CatWChainsaw 3y agoHow would you design experiments to test its necessity?
- wizofaus 3y agoWhy would you need to? I've never worshipped anything in my life as far as I can tell, yet I'm pretty sure I'm a functioning human being.
- CatWChainsaw 3y agoIt's not about need, it's about ambition, a trait often lauded here.
- pauldenton 3y agothe proof is that spiritualism and religion have independently formed in every culture and every far flung corner on Earth. Easter Island had religion. Inuit had religion. Australian natives had religion. If humans ever settled on Antarctica they would have religion.
- defrost 3y ago[dead]
- standardUser 3y agoYou get that in a Cracker Jack box or what?
- standardUser 3y agoIt's not an argument at all. It's an inane series of leading questions intended to create the illusion of an argument.