4 ms·
You can't have this discussion on HN. It is firmly established precedent here that murdering people and burning down buildings is a superior form of protest to
by caeril 3y ago
You can't have this discussion on HN.
It is firmly established precedent here that murdering people and burning down buildings is a superior form of protest to slightly inconveniencing commerce.
I don't know what you thought you'd accomplish arguing on the basis of net harm on this site, but that doesn't happen here. You need to only understand the oppressor/oppressed dynamic. Protesting injustice against ten million gainfully employed oppressors is unacceptable. Protesting injustice against a single violent criminal is praised.
Your downvotes are well and truly deserved. Not for being wrong, which you're not, but for not knowing your audience.
- Dylan16807 3y ago> It is firmly established precedent here that murdering people and burning down buildings is a superior form of protest to slightly inconveniencing commerce. Have you considered that the percent of the people in the crowd committing crimes makes a big difference for how some people want to enforce the law? Instead of that stupid strawman?
- refurb 3y agoOh I know my audience, and I know to expect downvotes. Thankfully the voting system here doesn't represent the beliefs of most Canadians/Americans when it comes to the Rule of Law. I do get a kick out of calling out the logical inconsistencies of those who try and talk around it.