6 ms·

What do you mean with vague information? There is an entire blog post describing the product: https://www.raspberrypi.com/news/introducing-raspberry-pi-5/ https

What do you mean with vague information? There is an entire blog post describing the product: https://www.raspberrypi.com/news/introducing-raspberry-pi-5/ https://www.raspberrypi.com/news/introducing-raspberry-pi-5/

iamtedd 3y ago
This is pretty bad: "Does Raspberry Pi 5 need active cooling? "Raspberry Pi 5 is faster and more powerful than prior-generation Raspberry Pis, and like most general-purpose computers, it will perform best with active cooling. The Raspberry Pi Case for Raspberry Pi 5, with its integrated fan, is one way to provide this." They pose a question themselves, and don't even answer it. Of course something will perform best with active cooling. Does it need it? I don't need this wishy-washy marketing language from Raspberry Pi.
- joefarish 3y ago
  I think they answer your question in the PSU section “Raspberry Pi 5 consumes significantly less power, and runs significantly cooler, than Raspberry Pi 4 when running an identical workload.”
  - wiz21c 3y ago
    I think the question is actually: "can I safely (like it's not going to melt or catch fire) use the RPI5 under any load without active cooling) ?".
    - mlyle 3y ago
      Sure, you can. If you frequently work it really hard, it'll have larger temperature swings and may fail earlier, but it'll still probably last quite awhile. The failure is not likely to be catching on fire.
  - dragontamer 3y ago
    That's not documentation of any reasonable level though. An MPU designer expects to see something like "200mA draw from the 1.2V power-domain when running at 400 MHz" or "10mA draw from the 1.2V power-domain when in first level of sleep". (Maybe not this small since Rasp. Pi is a more powerful chip, but... you know... actual specifics).
  - iamtedd 3y ago
    Not on the linked page. "Will my Raspberry Pi 4 power supply work with Raspberry Pi 5? "Raspberry Pi 5 is a higher-performance computer than Raspberry Pi 4, and you may have problems using an under-powered supply. We recommend a high-quality 5W 5A USB-C power supply, such as the new Raspberry Pi 27W USB-C Power Supply." The question asks about power requirements, but the answer is about performance? The first time I read that I thought the 5 needs more power than the 4, not less.
    - weebull 3y ago
      > we recommend a 5w PSU like our new 27W PSU Ermmm, what?
      - pja 3y ago
        It’s a typo: They mean 5A I think.
      - marcosdumay 3y ago
        It's clearly a typo, and should be 5V. But then you get 5V 5A ... 27W that is clearly incorrect too. So my guess is nobody is proofreading the technical specifications, and everybody that cares was kept away from that page.
        nimmen 3y ago
        5V * 5A = 25W, no PSU is 100% effective so 27W is reasonable requirement
        ralphm 3y ago
        I expect it is 27W to support 9V 3V, not because of tolerances per se. (Source https://www.sparkfun.com/products/23583 https://www.sparkfun.com/products/23583)
        marcosdumay 3y ago
        You don't specify a PSU by its energy consumption. You specify it by output. Also, that 92% efficiency, is believable, but a bit high for a 5V 5A PSU (this is a difficult combination). I would expect any such unity to be marketed as high-efficiency.
- mlyle 3y ago
  The answer is nuanced. It can run workloads somewhat faster and cooler than Pi 4 without active cooling. But it also can't reach close to its peak performance without active cooling.
  - iamtedd 3y ago
    Your answer is more direct and uses fewer words. Can you help them fix their product page?
    - mlyle 3y ago
      Probably not ;) The actual info I'd rely upon at this point: https://www.phoronix.com/benchmark/result/raspberry-pi-5-cooling-benchmarks/result-1.svgz https://www.phoronix.com/benchmark/result/raspberry-pi-5-coo... pi5 with active cooler is about 1.2-1.5x faster than pi5 without cooler for most workloads that care than without. Pi5 with active cooler is about 2-2.5x faster than Pi4. So Pi5 without cooler is probably about 1.5x faster than pi4, depending upon workload. (And more than this for quick bursts where thermal mass wins).
      - darkclouds 3y ago
        And if you dont have a heatsink and fan of sorts just use alternativing fingers on the cpu, they can still absorb about 10-15 DegC off the cpu temp and thats overclocking a 3b in the 1.35Ghz range. Surprisingly robust. Sadly cant get it to idle below .6Ghz yet, that needs more work. But it makes wonder how much more phone manufacturers could squeeze out of their phones, although Apple are definately overclocking the 15.
    - nsteel 3y ago
      Should we get Intel and AMD to clarify their product pages at the same time?
      - noizejoy 3y ago
        Haha - and while we’re at it, might as well start putting labels on Apple’s performance graph slides :-)
- tpmx 3y ago
  "peak power consumption increases to around 12W, versus 8W for Raspberry Pi 4" A beefy heatsink case should be able to handle that.
- m463 3y ago
  requiring cooling limits the use case. (remember, they've sold > 30 million of them) I'm pretty sure what it means is that kids who use the pi on their desk don't need to spend on a cooler. It will probably throttle and run slower. Meanwhile an adult using the pi could put on a cooler and wring lots of performance out of it.
- M4v3R 3y ago
  Are we reading the same blog post? The post that parent posted literally reads: > "Raspberry Pi 5 has been designed to handle typical client workloads, uncased, with no active cooling".
  - iamtedd 3y ago
    No, I'm reading the posted product page. Where all the important, technical (considering the product) information should be.
  - mytailorisrich 3y ago
    'uncased', which is the problem with many boards for the hobbyist market, from compute to sensors. IMHO, uncased means you're doing maintenance or it's a toy, but it's not a 'production' configuration.
    - marcosdumay 3y ago
      They can't tell you how the board will behave on any random case you decide to put it on. The uncased requirement is exactly what I'd expect to see there. Other than that, only if they decide to get really technical (they should) and tell you dissipating power / °C and temperature limits.
- jrockway 3y ago
  It depends on what "need" means. I'm pretty sure you can take a 400W TDP Threadripper and run it without active cooling. It will throttle down to run at whatever speed (well, TDP) that doesn't fry it. The Raspberry Pi does the same thing. If your goal is to get the highest score on every benchmark, then yeah, you need active cooling. That has been true on every Raspberry Pi, I think. (I don't remember if the 1 needed active cooling. I did not have any. I also remember it taking over a day to recompile Linux! Still faster than setting up a cross compiler at the time ;)
  - KennyBlanken 3y ago
    Threadrippers use 50W+ at idle, so no, it won't just "throttle down"
    - jrockway 3y ago
      Mine uses about 80, but yeah, you can get rid of 80W passively. Consider a 100 watt incandescent light bulb; no fan!
      - waterhouse 3y ago
        And how hot does the bulb get? Googling yields "The surface temperature of incandescent light bulbs varies from 150 to more than 250 degrees" (https://www.pacificlamp.com/temperature-of-a-100-watt-bulb.asp https://www.pacificlamp.com/temperature-of-a-100-watt-bulb.a...). Which, googling says, is likely hot enough to damage a CPU.
        vel0city 3y ago
        150F is like 65C which loads of CPUs run fine at. Going past 212F (100C) is usually where you'll start having problems with a lot of common desktop processors.
- efitz 3y ago
  I hate it when someone answers a yes/no question with something other than yes or no. Here’s my proposed edit: Q: "Does Raspberry Pi 5 need active cooling? Original A: "Raspberry Pi 5 is faster and more powerful than prior-generation Raspberry Pis…” Better A: "For modest workloads, no. For heavier workloads, you will get better performance with active cooling. Raspberry Pi 5 is faster and more powerful than prior-generation Raspberry Pis…”
- epolanski 3y ago
  It literally tells you that you don't need cooling, but if you add it you'll get more performance. I don't find it hard to understand what this means: the soc limits it's core performance based on thermal conditions and will throttle when hitting limit temperature. That's standard behavior on every computer or smartphone or GPU out there. Make temperature lower and it will clock and run at higher speeds without throttling.
- justin66 3y ago
  Who hurt you?
- lofaszvanitt 3y ago
  Another reason not to buy it.
rsaxvc 3y ago
Says h265 decode, but nothing about h264. Does VC7 do h264 like VC6, or not at all?

iamtedd 3y ago

This is pretty bad: "Does Raspberry Pi 5 need active cooling? "Raspberry Pi 5 is faster and more powerful than prior-generation Raspberry Pis, and like most general-purpose computers, it will perform best with active cooling. The Raspberry Pi Case for Raspberry Pi 5, with its integrated fan, is one way to provide this." They pose a question themselves, and don't even answer it. Of course something will perform best with active cooling. Does it need it? I don't need this wishy-washy marketing language from Raspberry Pi.

joefarish 3y ago
I think they answer your question in the PSU section “Raspberry Pi 5 consumes significantly less power, and runs significantly cooler, than Raspberry Pi 4 when running an identical workload.”
- wiz21c 3y ago
  I think the question is actually: "can I safely (like it's not going to melt or catch fire) use the RPI5 under any load without active cooling) ?".
  - mlyle 3y ago
    Sure, you can. If you frequently work it really hard, it'll have larger temperature swings and may fail earlier, but it'll still probably last quite awhile. The failure is not likely to be catching on fire.
- dragontamer 3y ago
  That's not documentation of any reasonable level though. An MPU designer expects to see something like "200mA draw from the 1.2V power-domain when running at 400 MHz" or "10mA draw from the 1.2V power-domain when in first level of sleep". (Maybe not this small since Rasp. Pi is a more powerful chip, but... you know... actual specifics).
- iamtedd 3y ago
  Not on the linked page. "Will my Raspberry Pi 4 power supply work with Raspberry Pi 5? "Raspberry Pi 5 is a higher-performance computer than Raspberry Pi 4, and you may have problems using an under-powered supply. We recommend a high-quality 5W 5A USB-C power supply, such as the new Raspberry Pi 27W USB-C Power Supply." The question asks about power requirements, but the answer is about performance? The first time I read that I thought the 5 needs more power than the 4, not less.
  - weebull 3y ago
    > we recommend a 5w PSU like our new 27W PSU Ermmm, what?
    - pja 3y ago
      It’s a typo: They mean 5A I think.
    - marcosdumay 3y ago
      It's clearly a typo, and should be 5V. But then you get 5V 5A ... 27W that is clearly incorrect too. So my guess is nobody is proofreading the technical specifications, and everybody that cares was kept away from that page.
      - nimmen 3y ago
        5V * 5A = 25W, no PSU is 100% effective so 27W is reasonable requirement
        ralphm 3y ago
        I expect it is 27W to support 9V 3V, not because of tolerances per se. (Source https://www.sparkfun.com/products/23583 https://www.sparkfun.com/products/23583)
        marcosdumay 3y ago
        You don't specify a PSU by its energy consumption. You specify it by output. Also, that 92% efficiency, is believable, but a bit high for a 5V 5A PSU (this is a difficult combination). I would expect any such unity to be marketed as high-efficiency.
mlyle 3y ago
The answer is nuanced. It can run workloads somewhat faster and cooler than Pi 4 without active cooling. But it also can't reach close to its peak performance without active cooling.
- iamtedd 3y ago
  Your answer is more direct and uses fewer words. Can you help them fix their product page?
  - mlyle 3y ago
    Probably not ;) The actual info I'd rely upon at this point: https://www.phoronix.com/benchmark/result/raspberry-pi-5-cooling-benchmarks/result-1.svgz https://www.phoronix.com/benchmark/result/raspberry-pi-5-coo... pi5 with active cooler is about 1.2-1.5x faster than pi5 without cooler for most workloads that care than without. Pi5 with active cooler is about 2-2.5x faster than Pi4. So Pi5 without cooler is probably about 1.5x faster than pi4, depending upon workload. (And more than this for quick bursts where thermal mass wins).
    - darkclouds 3y ago
      And if you dont have a heatsink and fan of sorts just use alternativing fingers on the cpu, they can still absorb about 10-15 DegC off the cpu temp and thats overclocking a 3b in the 1.35Ghz range. Surprisingly robust. Sadly cant get it to idle below .6Ghz yet, that needs more work. But it makes wonder how much more phone manufacturers could squeeze out of their phones, although Apple are definately overclocking the 15.
  - nsteel 3y ago
    Should we get Intel and AMD to clarify their product pages at the same time?
    - noizejoy 3y ago
      Haha - and while we’re at it, might as well start putting labels on Apple’s performance graph slides :-)
tpmx 3y ago
"peak power consumption increases to around 12W, versus 8W for Raspberry Pi 4" A beefy heatsink case should be able to handle that.
m463 3y ago
requiring cooling limits the use case. (remember, they've sold > 30 million of them) I'm pretty sure what it means is that kids who use the pi on their desk don't need to spend on a cooler. It will probably throttle and run slower. Meanwhile an adult using the pi could put on a cooler and wring lots of performance out of it.
M4v3R 3y ago
Are we reading the same blog post? The post that parent posted literally reads: > "Raspberry Pi 5 has been designed to handle typical client workloads, uncased, with no active cooling".
- iamtedd 3y ago
  No, I'm reading the posted product page. Where all the important, technical (considering the product) information should be.
- mytailorisrich 3y ago
  'uncased', which is the problem with many boards for the hobbyist market, from compute to sensors. IMHO, uncased means you're doing maintenance or it's a toy, but it's not a 'production' configuration.
  - marcosdumay 3y ago
    They can't tell you how the board will behave on any random case you decide to put it on. The uncased requirement is exactly what I'd expect to see there. Other than that, only if they decide to get really technical (they should) and tell you dissipating power / °C and temperature limits.
jrockway 3y ago
It depends on what "need" means. I'm pretty sure you can take a 400W TDP Threadripper and run it without active cooling. It will throttle down to run at whatever speed (well, TDP) that doesn't fry it. The Raspberry Pi does the same thing. If your goal is to get the highest score on every benchmark, then yeah, you need active cooling. That has been true on every Raspberry Pi, I think. (I don't remember if the 1 needed active cooling. I did not have any. I also remember it taking over a day to recompile Linux! Still faster than setting up a cross compiler at the time ;)
- KennyBlanken 3y ago
  Threadrippers use 50W+ at idle, so no, it won't just "throttle down"
  - jrockway 3y ago
    Mine uses about 80, but yeah, you can get rid of 80W passively. Consider a 100 watt incandescent light bulb; no fan!
    - waterhouse 3y ago
      And how hot does the bulb get? Googling yields "The surface temperature of incandescent light bulbs varies from 150 to more than 250 degrees" (https://www.pacificlamp.com/temperature-of-a-100-watt-bulb.asp https://www.pacificlamp.com/temperature-of-a-100-watt-bulb.a...). Which, googling says, is likely hot enough to damage a CPU.
      - vel0city 3y ago
        150F is like 65C which loads of CPUs run fine at. Going past 212F (100C) is usually where you'll start having problems with a lot of common desktop processors.
efitz 3y ago
I hate it when someone answers a yes/no question with something other than yes or no. Here’s my proposed edit: Q: "Does Raspberry Pi 5 need active cooling? Original A: "Raspberry Pi 5 is faster and more powerful than prior-generation Raspberry Pis…” Better A: "For modest workloads, no. For heavier workloads, you will get better performance with active cooling. Raspberry Pi 5 is faster and more powerful than prior-generation Raspberry Pis…”
epolanski 3y ago
It literally tells you that you don't need cooling, but if you add it you'll get more performance. I don't find it hard to understand what this means: the soc limits it's core performance based on thermal conditions and will throttle when hitting limit temperature. That's standard behavior on every computer or smartphone or GPU out there. Make temperature lower and it will clock and run at higher speeds without throttling.
justin66 3y ago
Who hurt you?
lofaszvanitt 3y ago
Another reason not to buy it.

rsaxvc 3y ago

Says h265 decode, but nothing about h264. Does VC7 do h264 like VC6, or not at all?