The commenter you're refering to is wrong and refer to a inaccurate/lying secondary source. Here is the primary source: https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2

The commenter you're refering to is wrong and refer to a inaccurate/lying secondary source. Here is the primary source: https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2022-05/ECE-TRANS-WP.29-2022-59r1e.pdf https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2022-05/ECE-TRANS-WP.2... It's the second time in that much week that Ars Technica blatantly lie about what's in the primary source, maybe trusting nobody would check. I'll wait until my subscription finish, but i won't be retaking one next year.