3 ms·
Regardless of where you stand on the LLM vs Copyright debate, that 3rd party would clearly be violating copyright by selling unlicensed content, though?
by red_trumpet 3y ago
Regardless of where you stand on the LLM vs Copyright debate, that 3rd party would clearly be violating copyright by selling unlicensed content, though?
- amelius 3y agoHow clear is it who owns the copyright?
- drdaeman 3y agoIf a third party poses themselves as a network operator (basically, acts as a proxy/dumb pipe) or a library (if they have a cache) they aren't liable, are they? I think they aren't because proxy and VPN providers, or CloudFlare's 1.1.1.1, or The Internet Archive are AFAIK not generally considered liable in any sort of infringement.
- rascul 3y ago> The Internet Archive are AFAIK not generally considered liable in any sort of infringement. Wasn't there a case earlier this year that found the Internet Archive liable for copyright infringement?
- drdaeman 3y agoOh, I wasn't aware. Thank you for pointing out. From what I've read, even though there's an injunction, IA was going to appeal, so I hope this isn't exactly over yet?