3 ms·
The censorship part is really worrying me here. We had enough drama with BeMyAI refusing to recognize faces (including faces of famous people) as it were. If s
by miki123211 3y ago
The censorship part is really worrying me here.
We had enough drama with BeMyAI refusing to recognize faces (including faces of famous people) as it were. If sighted people have the right of accessing porn and sexting, why shouldn't we? Who should dictate what content is "appropriate", and what about cultures with different opinions on the subject?
- adventured 3y ago> Who should dictate what content is "appropriate", and what about cultures with different opinions on the subject? OpenAI should dictate that, because GPT 4 belongs to them. So they decide what kind of service they're interested in offering. There will be plenty of other powerful LLMs that can be used in the near future. Some will be more restrictive, some will be less. If you want fewer restrictions, you will be able to pick one that offers that for you.
- kypro 3y ago> There will be plenty of other powerful LLMs that can be used in the near future. Extremely optimistic take. What tends to happen is you get centralisation, and regulatory capture ensures the largest players dictate what is an acceptable to the incumbents who wish to do things differently. I mean in theory you can go set up your own social network or video sharing site with whatever rules you like, but you should assume government regulators and big tech will attack you if you do so and believe in the principles of free speech, or simply wish to create a safe-space for conspiracy theorists.