4 ms·
So why have existing taxes on guns and ammunition not been struck down?
by bandyaboot 3y ago
So why have existing taxes on guns and ammunition not been struck down?
- agensaequivocum 3y agoBecause someone needs to challenge the law and pre-Bruen court acted like the 2A didn't exist.
- bandyaboot 3y agoI see. We’re just waiting on a case to be brought before a True Scotsman.
- seanmcdirmid 3y ago> pre-Bruen court acted like the 2A didn't exist. You mean, before Bruen the court acted like that first clause of the 2A was more than just flavor text.
- agensaequivocum 3y agoFind me a gun control law the 9th circuit didn't consider too far. I'll wait. I refer you to this thread[1] of dozens of sources that show the only pre-20th century view is the individual right view consistent with Heller, McDonald, and Bruen. [1]https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1645290263299117056 https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1645290263299117056
- Acrobatic_Road 3y agoBecause they don't exist, other than the Pittman-Robertson Act. And nobody has ever challenged that act because the tax proceeds go to conservation, which hunters appreciate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pittman%E2%80%93Robertson_Federal_Aid_in_Wildlife_Restoration_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pittman%E2%80%93Robertson_Fede...