2 ms·
From the report: 16% were problematic, AKA they could not determine with enough precision if they were junk. The remaining 6% didn't publish enough information
by Maken 3y ago
From the report: 16% were problematic, AKA they could not determine with enough precision if they were junk. The remaining 6% didn't publish enough information to even assess them.
So yes, they are also junk.
- black_puppydog 3y agoI came here to confirm that I hadn't missed something in the article. Thanks for confirming. This is so fucked up...
- christkv 3y agoI'm not surprised the pioneers of this was Enron after all.
- nonethewiser 3y agoThat is incredible. I just assumed the other 22% were not junk but it’s actually worse than the title implies.