3 ms·
UESP is the gold standard for wikis. https://uesp.net/wiki/Main_Page https://uesp.net/wiki/Main_Page
by yoyohello13 3y ago
UESP is the gold standard for wikis.
https://uesp.net/wiki/Main_Page https://uesp.net/wiki/Main_Page
- bpiche 3y agoBethesda enjoyers are blessed with this wonderful wiki. And action RPG fans have fextralife - another solid gold standard for wikis. It's a great time to be a fan. https://fextralife.com/ https://fextralife.com/
- hightrix 3y agoFextralife is worse than fandom, by far. The forced twitch view botting along with the horrendous site layout make it one of the worst wiki sites that exist.
- bpiche 3y agoThat's a fair point. Worse than fandom, I am not sure. Fandom takes up 80% of your screen on mobile with ads. I've had all of the ads blocked on fex for so long, I forgot they existed. Thanks for the reminder!
- digging 3y agoI never thought I'd see fextralife called a gold standard. It's also quite bad... better than "Fandom" though I guess. For example, Bloodborne has a "Fandom", a fextralife, and an actual high-quality wiki at https://www.bloodborne-wiki.com/ https://www.bloodborne-wiki.com/
- SSLy 3y agoThey also spun up a Starfield wiki, still no salvation for the Fallout players out there https://starfieldwiki.net/ https://starfieldwiki.net/
- paradox460 3y agoI'm hoping this is the one that takes off. It's very young, and the information is very hit-and-miss, but its growing, and since its a young wiki, its easy to add information that's missing
- brucethemoose2 3y agoAnd yet Fandom outranks them, and "steals" contributors: https://www.google.com/search?q=lydia+skyrim https://www.google.com/search?q=lydia+skyrim
- yoyohello13 3y agoYeah, Fandom just has better SEO unfortunately.