This is needlessly pedantic and also wrong Being 28 meters apart makes a maximum 93 nanoseconds difference in time between the light reaching each other The a

This is needlessly pedantic and also wrong Being 28 meters apart makes a maximum 93 nanoseconds difference in time between the light reaching each other The article says "same millisecond", not "same moment". +/- 93 nanoseconds makes no real difference to the resulting image, the photos were likely thousands of nanoseconds apart edit: not to mention photographs don't capture a precise moment in time but a window of time, in this case one of them captured 1ms of time and the other 0.625ms, and those windows overlapped almost entirely