3 ms·
The link quite clearly states the land is under dispute. While the two countries may disagree which of them owns it, they quite clearly agree nobody else does.
by tw04 3y ago
The link quite clearly states the land is under dispute. While the two countries may disagree which of them owns it, they quite clearly agree nobody else does. I'm not an expert in international law, but I'm quite confident you would be laughed out of the room trying to claim ownership of the land in an international court.
- trickstra 3y agoI'm not trying to become an international lawyer. The thread mentioned terra nullius, so I'm just pointing out what that definition says and what are the real-world examples, where these lands are clearly mentioned. Not sure why somebody gets so triggered by it. Let me point out that these two countries don't just "disagree which one of them owns it", they both say "we don't own it", which makes all the difference. Maybe someone with more knowledge can explain whether Croatia's constitution can say "this land belongs to Serbia", I personally don't see how that would be possible.