4 ms·

So... not open source, but pretending to be.

• amelius 3y ago
  Open source, in the literal sense of the word.
  • a1369209993 3y ago
    Open source in only the literal sense of the word. It's like calling a wild boar from the midwestern coast of Africa a "Guinea pig". It's not actually lying (/pretending/cetera), since they clearly expect people to understand the distinction they're making, and so far it looks like most do, but it's still unforunately unclear (and rather needlessly so, since "source available" works just as well, if equally imprecisely).
• Tao3300 3y ago
  They didn't say "Open Source", they said "open-source".