5 ms·
Nor can you prove that a language is error prone by providing a 40 line example written in an antiquated style that deliberately avoids using the safety feature
by klyrs 3y ago
Nor can you prove that a language is error prone by providing a 40 line example written in an antiquated style that deliberately avoids using the safety features at one's disposal.
- IshKebab 3y agoYes you can, if you have to be very experienced or unreasonably thorough to know that all those safety features exist. Opt-in safety is clearly worse than opt-out safety.
- patrick451 3y agoThis assertions is representative of the myopic one-dimensional think of rustaceans. It only makes sense if the only thing your care about is safety.
- klyrs 3y agoOkay, get specific. What in my implementation requires extensive experience, or where was I unreasonably thorough?