3 ms·
It's always more nuanced, but headlines don't have room for that. If you advocate for "mostly remote work, with hybrid scheduling and hot desking as needed", s
by LeifCarrotson 3y ago
It's always more nuanced, but headlines don't have room for that.
If you advocate for "mostly remote work, with hybrid scheduling and hot desking as needed", some unempathetic execs and clueless middle micromanagers are inevitably going to try to turn that into a privilege to be allowed to work from home once a month. You have to open the negotiation by demanding full remote, so there's room for concessions allowing a few satellite campuses and occasional all-hands meetings.
- RestlessMind 3y ago> unempathetic execs and clueless middle micromanagers What about clueless employees who think remote is great for their needs but is actually counterproductive to what the company needs?
- orwin 3y agoThe employee only have to care about their work and paycheck. Is they were paid to accommodate company needs, CEO wouldn't be paid 500 times the media pay and C-suite wouldn't be paid 100 times what I earn.
- RestlessMind 3y agoThat doesn't answer my comment at all in the context of this thread