2 ms·
One thing that i think is really missing is redundancy on the proxies Currently there's no way to have two proxies that listen on the same tailscale hostname/i
by shawabawa3 3y ago
One thing that i think is really missing is redundancy on the proxies
Currently there's no way to have two proxies that listen on the same tailscale hostname/ip
Ideally in Kubernetes every pod is redundant to allow downscaling of nodes efficiently, so this means we have to eat a minute or so of downtime randomly every now and then on our tailscale endpoints
- vorpalhex 3y agoCan't you expose the services to two load balancers? Not ideal for anything customer facing but fine enough for staff.
- shawabawa3 3y agothey would have to have two separate hostnames/ips so you wouldn't have a single redundant endpoint
- gameoverhumans 3y agoI agree, it's a feature that I find sorely lacking in my tailnet. These are the relevant Github issues to follow, hopefully they address these someday: https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/issues/465 https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/issues/465 https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/issues/4324 https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/issues/4324