3 ms·

You're right, because clearly anyone who takes an AI-generated Moebius-style image and puts it on a blog post about message queues or a recipe or whatever would

by pc86 3y ago

You're right, because clearly anyone who takes an AI-generated Moebius-style image and puts it on a blog post about message queues or a recipe or whatever would have just bought a licensed Moebius image otherwise.

freejazz 3y ago
So your argument is that infringement is okay, because they would have done it anyway? Not a great legal defense
- pc86 3y ago
  I'm replying to "you should ask permission from Moebius' estate, since they stand to lose revenue by your model" - there are no damages. Whether it's infringement or not is not really relevant to that point.
  - rendall 3y ago
    You brought up a thing that was not machine learning to argue that machine learning does not infringe?
    - pc86 3y ago
      I don't know how many different ways I can say "I'm talking about infringement." I'm not talking about infringement.
      - freejazz 3y ago
        You said there's no damages. The lost licensing fee is the basis for actual damages, plus there's likely statutory damages available here too.