4 ms·
I think that is a reductive dismissal of a real problem. Rust is intended as a C++ replacement, but interfacing to existing C and C++ code can be very messy, it
by BaculumMeumEst 3y ago
I think that is a reductive dismissal of a real problem. Rust is intended as a C++ replacement, but interfacing to existing C and C++ code can be very messy, it’s not just simple language bindings. What I’m suggesting is that the work needs to be spread out or it’s not likely to happen.
- IshKebab 3y agoC is fairly effortless, but I agree C++ could be better. But hardly any languages integrate with C++ very well. Have you ever used SWIG? (Shudder...) I do agree it would be nice if it could. The cxx crate is ok but we could do a lot more. Maybe something like SWIG but based on LLVM so it actually works properly.