No, I don't think so. I have no evidence they are the same. I'm part of the people that pointed out that 'free speech absolutist' banned accounts that never pos

No, I don't think so. I have no evidence they are the same. I'm part of the people that pointed out that 'free speech absolutist' banned accounts that never posted CP, and barely made fun of a burning car, for political reasons. Corporate does corporate things. If Twitter was nationalized, 'rules for me and not for you' would be outrageous. Right now? If anybody is surprised it's their own damn fault.