4 ms·
>>>it was done to confuse people by having them compare 1 vs 4 I think it's more likely it was done that way because they were paraphrasing their source which
by staticman2 3y ago
>>>it was done to confuse people by having them compare 1 vs 4
I think it's more likely it was done that way because they were paraphrasing their source which wasn't consistent:
"Four in 10 (41 percent) women report having received emotional support from a friend within the past week, compared to 21 percent of men." https://www.americansurveycenter.org/research/the-state-of-american-friendship-change-challenges-and-loss/ https://www.americansurveycenter.org/research/the-state-of-a...
- baldeagle 3y agoThank you for that awareness. I didn't look at the source before jumping to conclusions. :) Still, that is mightly close to 2x, and a little bit of rounding would have made the message clearer (and likely stayed within the error bars of the original paper (which I did not read))