4 ms·
Not exactly. But generally making less harmful drugs legal would help - generally the more prohibition the stronger the drugs become.
by quonn 3y ago
Not exactly. But generally making less harmful drugs legal would help - generally the more prohibition the stronger the drugs become.
- Eddy_Viscosity2 3y agoMaking all drugs legal to use makes sense to me. Criminalizing users only makes things worse. But make it illegal to sell, transport, possess in large quantities etc.
- amanaplanacanal 3y agoHow are drug users going to know what they are buying if they are illegal to sell? Dealers are putting fentanyl in cocaine nowadays. It wouldn’t surprise me if a large number of fentanyl overdoses were by people who had no idea they were taking fentanyl at all.
- Eddy_Viscosity2 3y agoDecriminalizing drug use is intended to solve a different problem - that being throwing people in jail for being addicts is bad in a number of ways and consequences. Making all drugs legal and available (with quality assurance) will (at least help) solve the problem you are talking about, but will at the same time create whole new problems that more and easier access to drugs will mean more people try and use them and then an increase in lives destroyed through addiction (and related consequences). My opinion is that would be worse.
- seanmcdirmid 3y agoDecriminalizing use basically decriminalizes selling as far as I can tell here in the northwest. Police and prosecutors can no longer threaten users with legal action to give up their dealers, and since buying is now low risk, dealing also becomes lower risk. I’ve seen people on the street looking for drugs and find them on my morning walks (they are pretty vocal when asking, and dealers aren’t shy about replying).
- Eddy_Viscosity2 3y agoIt would be easy to put out fake buyers to find the sellers. Sounds like lazy policing.
- seanmcdirmid 3y agoIt is hard to find police that can convincingly do unhoused drug addict well enough.
- filoeleven 3y agoThere are test kits available that can show you what you have, including tests for fentanyl. It requires a bunch of different reagent tests if you bought a Mystery Powder that you want to ID. But if you were after MDMA, for example, and bought what’s claimed to be MDMA, you can test it with a specific reagent to confirm whether it is that or not, then test it with a fentanyl test strip to show if it’s free of that contaminant. Dance Safe sets up tents at big festivals to do this kind of testing as a harm reduction service. They (and others) are trying to normalize the step of testing what you have before using it, and I think that’s a wise choice especially with fentanyl in the mix. I’d expect that with decriminalized use of “white powder” drugs, you’d see these kits become more readily available from smoke shops, maybe even pharmacies, instead of being something you have to search for online.
- xtracto 3y agoThe problem I see with criminalizing drugs (including sell, posses and transport) is that drug addicts and abuse is mainly a health issue. There's an underlying reason why those people start consuming that shit. Same as with sugar/obesity/diabetes here in Mexico. Once you make it ilegal, suddenly you created a criminal issue. You've created another problem for yourself and split your resources to fight both problems now. I would rather prefer government/society focus only in the underlying health issue. And disappear the criminal issue by making it 100% legal. Imagine if suddenly refined sugar became illegal in Mexico, suddenly the government would have to fight not only the obesity epidemic, but also the sugar trafficking criminals.