4 ms·
It literally says in the article that the mother was a promoter of consequentialism which excuses any act, no matter how dastardly, so long as you believe the
by tjpnz 3y ago
It literally says in the article that the mother was a promoter of consequentialism which excuses any act, no matter how dastardly, so long as you believe the end justifies the means. If she lacked a moral compass it's of no surprise her son didn't have one either.
- tasuki 3y ago> a promoter of consequentialism which excuses any act, no matter how dastardly, so long as you believe the end justifies the means That is not consequentialism at all. Consequentialism is just the opposite: what matters is the consequences of your actions, not what you believe.