5 ms·
> The new “inverse vaccine” does just the opposite: it removes the immune system’s memory of one molecule Very cool, but what would happen if that molecule was
by tomohawk 3y ago
> The new “inverse vaccine” does just the opposite: it removes the immune system’s memory of one molecule
Very cool, but what would happen if that molecule was small pox?
- JonathonW 3y agoThe US and Europe haven't vaccinated for smallpox since the early '70s and routine vaccination wrapped up globally in the mid-'80s, so, for many... absolutely nothing.
- hinkley 3y agoI used to be amused when period pieces would show actresses (particularly European) in sleeveless attire with their smallpox vaccine scar, three feet tall in the closeup shots. Turns out smallpox vaccines are a lot older than I thought. They might have not looked exactly like that in Victorian England, but an iteration of it did already exist. Guess that's why they cover up tattoos but not smallpox scars.
- jiofj 3y agoI know many people in my country, Spain, who are 60+ and have smallpox vaccine scars.
- arcticbull 3y agoYeah the first effective Smallpox vaccines were almost 230 years ago, and actually predates the Victorian era by a couple of decades. Vaccination through exposing healthy people to smallpox to build immunity goes back to like 200 BCE. [1] [1] https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/history-of-vaccination/a-brief-history-of-vaccination https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/history-of-vaccinati...
- dogsgobork 3y agoSince smallpox was eradicated over 40 years ago and most people alive today have not been vaccinated against it, I doubt it would matter much.
- bitwize 3y agoSmallpox is one heist away from being unleashed on the world again, if that. And with most people unvaccinated, well... there's your bioweapon.
- Dylan16807 3y agoThen you don't need to remove any immunity, right?
- readthenotes1 3y agoGood question! s/small pox/a marker for a harmful agent/
- h2odragon 3y agosmallpox is a bit more than a molecule.
- BurningFrog 3y agoMore generally, if you told the immune system to ignore a still existing disease, it would probably be defenseless if/when you actually got infected by it. Or could the immune system maybe override this if you got really sick?
- samus 3y agoAdd I understand it, it's not about actively ignoring something. Rather, the immune system somehow learned to react more strongly to specific antigens, and undoing that. The natural immune reaction should still happen when encountering diseases, and not when encountering normal body tissues. It's possible to use such tricks to actively shut down the immune system, but you either have to incorporate it into the disease (which actually happens in nature) or take that medicine continuously.