5 ms·
The fact that there's a limit is not surprising. That the limit is 2GB is a little surprising, but this is across all sites, so ok. That there's no cache ejecti
by sigil 15y ago
The fact that there's a limit is not surprising. That the limit is 2GB is a little surprising, but this is across all sites, so ok. That there's no cache ejection when you reach the limit just seems like a bug. Why not use LRU?
- lallysingh 15y agoThe 2GB isn't just the local web-cache-size limit?
- espeed 15y agoIsn't 2 GB the memory limit on V8 (http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=847 http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=847)?
- The_Sponge 15y agoThat's for the javascript engine, not necessarily for the caching.
- moonboots 15y agoI would not want one rogue site evicting the caches of all other sites.
- sigil 15y agoIt's just a cache. It can be repopulated. But I see your point, a lower per-domain quota would make more sense.