3 ms·
> I encourage everyone to read about the DNC fraud lawsuit where the DNC argued that they have no obligation to hold a fair primary because they're a corporatio
by kadoban 3y ago
> I encourage everyone to read about the DNC fraud lawsuit where the DNC argued that they have no obligation to hold a fair primary because they're a corporation and the nomination process isn't constitutionally protected: ...
I mean, they're correct though right? The major political parties used to just decide who the nominee was in whatever shady-ass backroom they felt like. The current system is vastly better than that.
If you want something even better, let's do it, but any real change is going to require constitutional amendments or at least _vast_ changes in many states.
- user3939382 3y agoI would say the primary is fraudulent since their representation of the process in court is very different from what they float to the public, and voters are disenfranchised as a result of the misrepresentation (the legal concept of fraud requires injury.)