3 ms·
It's not CEO's doing something wrong. It's workers. Try "year of the submissive worker" maybe "year of the dominated worker" and see how that tastes in your mo
by hayst4ck 3y ago
It's not CEO's doing something wrong. It's workers.
Try "year of the submissive worker" maybe "year of the dominated worker" and see how that tastes in your mouth.
It's workers lack of unionization and enforced professional ethics that means there are no consequences for being "greedy" and that being "greedy" is in fact a winning strategy in the game of prisoners dilemma.
It's convenient when someone else is doing something wrong and they need to change, but if you want change, you need to look in the mirror and ask what you are doing wrong and for most of us, that is failing to unionize in order to get a seat at the negotiating table and therefore being able to check otherwise unchecked CEO/Board power.
Wage is a measurement of power, not value. Wage is capped by value provided, but scales with power.
- pjc50 3y agoThis is a very hostile way to phrase a pro-union argument, and I can't actually see how it would help here.
- mejutoco 3y ago> Wage is capped by value provided, but scales with power. Did you mean: "Wage scales with value provided, but is capped by power". It seems to make more sense to me.