3 ms·
I wonder why it took them 3 years to find out, I thought these radiation tests are pretty basic these days due to cancer scares some decade and half (?) ago. I
by saiya-jin 3y ago
I wonder why it took them 3 years to find out, I thought these radiation tests are pretty basic these days due to cancer scares some decade and half (?) ago. I think gsmarena publishes similar values in their summary pages, but maybe its just copy paste from release material.
- tuyiown 3y ago> I wonder why it took them 3 years to find out From the ANFR publication [1] «141 mobile phones, including Apple’s iPhone 12, have recently been tested to check compliance with limit SAR values». I suspect they simply weren't tested before. sigh. [1] https://www.anfr.fr/liste-actualites/actualite/temporary-withdrawal-from-the-market-of-the-iphone-12-for-non-compliance-with-eu-regulation https://www.anfr.fr/liste-actualites/actualite/temporary-wit...
- Algent 3y agoMost EU regulations let manufacturers self certify they are observing them. This should come with heavy testing but sadly this is so irregular you can get away with a lot. A few years ago a French tech journal caught several huge chinese PSU maker who claimed they had all certification but during actual testing they would catch fire or short under 50% of rated load.
- fersarr 3y agoYea this should have been acted on faster. I wish we had more of this data easily available for everything. Ear buds are directly next to our heads.
- bondant 3y agoI guess this is because the agency is underfunded. Their missions are not only to check the radiation on new phones but also to check all 2G/3G/4G/5G in France (about 200k) and investigated in case of radio-frequency problems.
- Fradow 3y agoThis was explained on French news: those radiation levels can vary with a software update. It's likely they were compliant before and a software update changed that. Which also means the fix can be a software update. That was (according to the news) the likely way this would be resolved.