4 ms·
There was a certain irony that they spent so much time talking about their environmental progress (the video with Mother Nature was riduculous, IMO), and then s
by gnicholas 3y ago
There was a certain irony that they spent so much time talking about their environmental progress (the video with Mother Nature was riduculous, IMO), and then slid in the USB-C bit without mentioning the environmental impact of ditching the lightning connector.
- toast0 3y agoI'm sure the environmental impact of ditching lightning is mixed. On the plus side, long term, having everyone on the same connector is good in lots of ways. In the short term, it's disruptive. It also makes it easier to switch between platforms or live in a multi-platform household; this is good for people, and might be good for Apple or might not. There's a reason Apple waited 10 years to change on iPhones, even though they switched to USB-C on other products. They could have potentially had both ports, but nobody seems to want to put two ports on phones, and Apple is not one to put an old and new thing together.
- nerpderp82 3y agoUSB-C should have been the lightning connector, it is a better connector than USB-C.
- Dork1234 3y agoUSB-C came out after lighting connector, 30 pin connector was at the end of the life when it came out. Apple didn't have a good choice.
- nerpderp82 3y agoUSB-C should have been the paddle style lightning connector. I am not saying that Apple should have used USB-C, I am saying that the physical connector for USB-C should have been the paddle style of lightning.
- Dylan16807 3y agoLightning seems to have some physical issues with power delivery, and I haven't seen the size difference matter for anything bigger than earbuds.