3 ms·
if this is true, then would it be a better investment to have the 2nd team produce a fuzz testing/systematic testing mechanism instead of producing a secondary
by chii 3y ago
if this is true, then would it be a better investment to have the 2nd team produce a fuzz testing/systematic testing mechanism instead of producing a secondary copy of the same system?
In fact, make it adversarial testing such that this team is rewarded (may be financially) if mistakes or problems are found from the 1st team's program.
- awestroke 3y agoSuch incentives can lead to reduced collaboration. If I get paid every time you make mistakes, I won't want you to get better at your job
- iraqmtpizza 3y agothe whole point is that they're not collaborating so as to avoid cross-contamination. also you don't get paid unless and until you identify the mistake. if you decrease the reward over time, there is an additional incentive to not sit on the information