2 ms·
Weird framing; surely the gun he had (also illegally in that state) was more concerning than the magazine? In any case, it doesn't sound like he meant to hurt
by mcpackieh 3y ago
Weird framing; surely the gun he had (also illegally in that state) was more concerning than the magazine? In any case, it doesn't sound like he meant to hurt people. The gun and magazine were in his car and he told police about it after they confronted (arrested?) him for being disorderly, presumably because they asked him if he had any weapons and he answered truthfully.
Given the intersection of "high-capacity magazine", "handgun" and "armor piercing rounds" my guess is he had an FN Five-seven with a standard capacity (20 round, illegal in California) magazine and probably standard 5.7 ammunition (not actually armor piercing rounds, but often misconstrued as such.) Possibly carelessly brought into the state because he's an Arizona resident who normally has a gun in his car. Or maybe he willingly flaunted California's laws, but either way cancelling the event after he was arrested does seem like an overabundance of caution.
- nicolashahn 3y agoIt's crazy to see Californian's reaction to this when in certain parts of the country you'll see half a dozen guns on hips if you walk into a Denny's.
- PrimeMcFly 3y agoIt's crazy that anywhere in the country allows half a dozen people to carry guns on their hips into a Denny's.
- Turing_Machine 3y agoYour opinion appears to be a minority one, more so with each passing year. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5a/Right_to_Carry%2C_timeline.gif https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5a/Right_to...
- PrimeMcFly 3y agoGood lord that's depressing.
- yeetawayhn 3y agoNot to mention calling something a "high capacity magazine" when it's only the magazine size that the manufacturer ships with the gun.